Recent Blog Posts in May 2011 |
| May 31, 2011 |
| Bakersfield Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
 |
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Bakersfield Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Bakersfield physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Bakersfield Urologists:
Hau H. Chang, MD
2120 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301-3703
(661) 327-3638
Bruce J. Joseph, MD
6001-B Truxtun Avenue Ste 220
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0675
(661) 323-6660
Shabbir A. Shakir, MD
2808 F Street Ste E
Bakersfield, CA 93301-1833
(661) 395-0688
Bakersfield Internal Medicine Specialists:
Jennifer J. Abraham, MD
3838 San Dimas Street Ste A100
Bakersfield, CA 93301-2284
(661) 324-4963
Eric J. Boren, MD
2121 17th Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301-3704
(661) 327-9693
Tabassum A. Chowdhury, MD
5959 Truxtun Ave Ste 200
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0437
(661) 324-1203
T A. Don Michael, MD
5343 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0641
(661) 861-7933
Franco A. Felizarta, MD
3535 San Dimas Street Ste 24
Bakersfield, CA 93301-1688
(661) 324-3128
Mariana D. Grozdeva, MD
3501 Stockdale Hwy.
Bakersfield, CA 93309-2150
(661) 328-9831
Ramesh C. Gupta, MD
1408 Commercial Way
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0407
(661) 327-4455
J M. Hewitt, MD
1701 26th Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301-2803
(661) 327-2208
Aung K. Htoo, MD
4000 Physicians Plaza
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 328-9831
David E. Kanamori, MD
6501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0633
(661) 322-2206
Vinod Kumar, MD
5020 Commerce Drive
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0631
(661) 324-4100
Naing T. Kyaw, MD
5030 Office Park Dr Ste A
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0612
(661) 323-2847
Ju H. Lee, MD
4580 California Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93309-1104
(661) 327-4411
Robin A. Matuk, MD
5959 Truxtun Ave Ste 200
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0437
(661) 324-1203
Mihaela Mihaluta-Pasaboc, MD
3857 Stockdale Hwy
Bakersfield, CA 93309-2187
(661) 832-1667
Elva M. Miranda, MD
5055 California Ave. Ste 215
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 328-9831
Kim T. Ng, MD
6501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0633
(661) 322-2206
Albert J. Peinado, MD
2701 Chester Ave Ste 201
Bakersfield, CA 93301-2016
(661) 716-1070
James R. Penrose, DO
5055 California Ave Ste 215
Bakersfield, CA 93309
(661) 328-9831
Randolph D. Senining, MD
6501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93309-0633
(661) 391-6305
June Somsin, DO
2701 Chester Ave Ste 202
Bakersfield, CA 93301-2016
(661) 716-9410
Kyaw K. Tun, MD
3733 San Dimas Street Ste 101
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 328-9831
Thu Yein, MD
4000 Physicians Plaza
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 328-9831
|
|
| Continue reading "Bakersfield Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
Permalink  |
| |
| May 31, 2011 |
| ViaXtreme Contains Undeclared Drug Ingredient Sulfoaildenafil |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
The FDA issued a public notification on Sunday regarding ViaXtreme, a supposedly “all natural” dietary supplement for men marketed as the “ultimate sexual enhancer.” ViaXtreme contains the undeclared drug ingredient sulfoaildenafil.
Sulfoaildenafil is structurally similar to sildenafil, the active ingredient in Viagra. This undeclared ingredient may interact with nitrates found in some prescription drugs such as nitroglycerin and may lower blood pressure to dangerous levels. Men with diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol or heart disease often take nitrates.
As the FDA points out, this is one example of “a growing trend of products marketed as dietary supplements or conventional foods with hidden drugs and chemicals. These products are typically promoted for sexual enhancement, weight loss, and body building, and are often represented as being ‘all natural.’” We have previously posted FDA warnings about other supposedly “all natural” diet and sexual enhancement products that in fact were not, including Prolactis,
Solo Slim,
Svelte 30,
Celerite,
Que She,
Fruta Planta,
Slim 30,
Joyful Slim Herb Supplement, and
Slimming Beauty Bitter Orange Slimming Capsules.
The takeaway from this is just because the label of a product sold over-the-counter says “herbal” or “all natural” doesn’t mean it actually is. Too often, that supposedly “proprietary blend” includes a prescription drug or its chemical equivalent, which could have dangerous side effects or interactions with other drugs you might be taking.
|
|
| Continue reading "ViaXtreme Contains Undeclared Drug Ingredient Sulfoaildenafil" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 30, 2011 |
| Anaheim Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Anaheim Propecia LawsuitsIf you used
Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Anaheim physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Anaheim Urologist:
Alfred A. Sidhom, MD
1211 W La Palma Ave #502
Anaheim, CA 92801-2812
(714) 776-7090
Anaheim Internal Medicine Specialists:
Amirtha Ajit, MD
1751 W Romneya Dr Ste F
Anaheim, CA 92801
(714) 776-3180
Rakesh K. Bhola, MD
1781 W Romneya Dr # C
Anaheim, CA 92801
(714) 776-2700
Samuel S. Cho, MD
1188 Euclid St
Anaheim, CA 92801
(714) 254-2747
Franklin A. Hanauer, MD
515 S Beach Blvd, Ste G
Anaheim, CA 92804
(714) 827-4240
Krishan S. Krishna, MD
3356 W Ball Rd No 210
Anaheim, CA 92804
(714) 826-0910
Jorge M. Mandelbaum, MD
1801 W Romneya Dr Ste 207
Anaheim, CA 92801
(714) 956-5200
David R. Simon, MD
3010 W Orange Ave #302
Anaheim, CA 92804-5904
(714) 826-1200
Bookinakere S. Subhas, MD
1751 W Romneya Dr Ste J
Anaheim, CA 92801
(714) 776-3566
|
|
| Continue reading "Anaheim Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 29, 2011 |
| Santa Ana Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Santa Ana Propecia LawsuitsIf you used
Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Santa Ana physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Santa Ana Urologists:
Lamia L. Gabal-Shehab, MD
720 N Tustin Ave, Ste 101
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 973-4600
Matthew L. Greenberger, MD
1801 N Broadway
Santa Ana, CA 92706
(714) 639-1915
Jeffrey E. Kaufman, MD
720 N Tustin Ave #101
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 973-4600
August J. Maggio Jr., MD
1125 E 17th St Suite W-240
Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 542-3563
Garo M. Tertzakian, MD
1801 N Broadway
Santa Ana, CA 92706
(714) 639-1915 x634
Santa Ana Internal Medicine Specialists:
Frank Badin, MD
999 N Tustin Ave #103
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 972-8818
Jane D. Curtis, MD
2212 E Fourth St # 304
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 541-3001
Michael W. Fitzgibbons, MD
1913 E 17th St #102
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 541-3744
Nguyen Huu, MD
1220 W Hemlock Way Ste 102
Santa Ana, CA 92707
(714) 957-0040
James G. Lozano, MD
1900 E 4th St
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 967-4591
Carlos Saad, MD
1401 N Tustin Ave Ste 350
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 558-8133
Leon I. Steinberg, MD
801 N Tustin Ave, Ste 205
Santa Ana, CA 92705-3600
(714) 558-6881
Timothy You, MD
1200 N Tustin Ave Ste 140
Santa Ana, CA 92705
(714) 972-8432
|
|
| Continue reading "Santa Ana Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 28, 2011 |
| Oakland Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Oakland Propecia LawsuitsIf you used
Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Oakland physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Oakland Urologists:
James B. Karol, MD
3300 Webster St #710
Oakland, CA 94609-3122
(510) 465-5800
Robert W. Kindrachuk, MD
3300 Webster St #710
Oakland, CA 94609-3122
(510) 465-5800
Robert S. Klein, MD
1950 Franklin St
Oakland, CA 94612-5103
(510) 987-4774
Phillip L. Ross, MD
350 30th St #100
Oakland, CA 94609
(510) 204-8290
C. C. Wen, MD
3300 Webster St #710
Oakland, CA 94609-3122
(510) 465-5800
Qingwei R. Yan, MD
3100 Telegraph Ave #3000
Oakland, CA 94609-3210
(510) 238-1238
|
|
| Continue reading "Oakland Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 27, 2011 |
| Sacramento Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Sacramento Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
Sacramento Propecia LawyersIf you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Sacramento physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Sacramento Area Urologists:
Leonard E. Crawford Jr., MD
2800 L Street #200
Sacramento, CA 95816-5616
(916) 453-5700
Ralph W. DeVere White, MD
4860 Y St #3500
Sacramento, CA 95817
(916) 734-5154
Jonathan A. Eandi, MD
2725 Capitol Ave #300
Sacramento, CA 95816
(916) 262-9370
Michael F. Eyolfson, MD
6600 Bruceville Rd
Sacramento, CA 95823
(916) 688-2081
Suzanne E. Generao, MD
2725 Capitol Ave #300
Sacramento, CA 95816
(916) 262-9370
Louis J. Giorgi Jr., MD
2725 Capitol Ave #300
Sacramento, CA 95816
(916) 262-9370
Kiumars R. Hekmat, MD
500 University Ave #200
Sacramento, CA 95825
(916) 921-1615
James M. Little, MD
6600 Bruceville Rd
Sacramento, CA 95823-4671
(916) 688-2279
Roger K. Low, MD
4860 Y St #2200
Sacramento, CA 95817
(916) 734-2893
David P. Magnus, MD
500 University Ave #200
Sacramento, CA 95825
(916) 921-1615
|
|
| Continue reading "Sacramento Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 26, 2011 |
| Long Beach Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Long Beach Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Long Beach physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Long Beach Urologists:
John E. Ingram, MD
2888 Long Beach Blvd Ste 340
Long Beach, CA 90806-1530
(562) 595-6891
Michael Norris, MD
2888 Long Beach Blvd Ste 340
Long Beach, CA 90806-1530
(562) 595-6891
Long Beach Internal Medicine Specialists:
Rafael A. Amaro, MD
200 Oceangate Ste 100
Long Beach, CA 90802
(310) 973-2161
Ronald A. Bitter, MD
2650 Elm Ave Ste 309
Long Beach, CA 90806-1600
(562) 595-8549
Richard L. Bock, MD
200 Oceangate Ste 100
Long Beach, CA 90802
(562) 435-3666
Deanna G. Cheung, MD
2865 Atlantic Ave Ste 227
Long Beach, CA 90806-7427
(562) 595-9366
Chester Choi, MD
1050 Linden Ave
Long Beach, CA 90813-3321
(562) 491-9352
Michael Freund, MD
3650 E South St Ste 110
Lakewood, CA 90712-1502
(562) 531-6140
Stanley A. Golanty, MD
2777 Pacific Ave Ste E
Long Beach, CA 90806-2625
(562) 426-6571
Stephen W. Hryniewicki, MD
2650 Elm Ave Ste 309
Long Beach, CA 90806
(562) 595-8549
Peter Y. Kaneshige, MD
2650 Elm Ave Ste 309
Long Beach, CA 90806
(562) 595-8549
Patricia A. Maciog, MD
6226 E Spring St Ste 240
Long Beach, CA 90815-1423
(562) 938-7129
Laurie A. Mortara, MD
2880 Atlantic Ave Ste 170
Long Beach, CA 90806-1715
(562) 595-7164
Kenneth E. Smith, MD
6475 E Pacific Coast Hwy, Ste 197
Long Beach, CA 90803
(562) 491-7006
Howard L. Worcester, MD
2650 Elm Ave Ste 309
Long Beach, CA 90806
(562) 595-8549
|
|
| Continue reading "Long Beach Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 25, 2011 |
| Fresno Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Fresno Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. Other side effects include depression and short term memory loss. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Fresno physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Fresno Urologists:
Narayana S. Ambati, MD
7014 N Whitney
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 322-2800
Kuldip J. Behniwal, MD
7014 N Whitney
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 321-2800
Jatinder P. Grewall, MD
7014 N. Whitney
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 321-2800
John C. Julian, MD
7014 N Whitney
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 322-2600
Yuk-yuen M. Leung, MD
7014 N Whitney Ave
Fresno, CA 93720-0155
(559) 321-2800
Thomas X. Minor, MD
6113 N. Fresno #101
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 438-2777
Nadeem U. Rahman, MD
6113 N. Fresno
Fresno, CO 93710
(559) 438-2777
H. G. Rainwater, MD
6113 N. Fresno #101
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 438-2777
William M. Schiff, MD
7014 N Whitney
Fresno, CA 93720
(559) 321-2800
|
|
| Continue reading "Fresno Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 25, 2011 |
| FDA Warns Not to Feed SimplyThick to Premature Infants |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
The FDA has warned that a thickening product called “SimplyThick” should not be fed to infants born before 37 weeks because it may cause a life-threatening condition. The FDA’s warning is based on reports of infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), in which tissue in the intestines becomes inflamed and dies. Parents should stop using the product even if their babies don’t appear sick.
SimplyThick is a thickening agent to help with swallowing difficulties. It is added to breast milk and infants’ formula to help premature babies swallow their food and keep it down, without spitting up.
So far, the FDA is aware of 15 cases of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), including two deaths. This is unusual because NEC most often occurs in babies while they are in the hospital early in their premature course. But some of the ill babies that FDA is aware of got sick after they had been discharged from the hospital and sent home on a feeding regimen that included SimplyThick.
For the complete FDA warning, click HERE.
If your baby has developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed SimplyThick, please report it to the FDA, so the agency is aware of the full scope of the problem. You may make the report online HERE.
|
|
| Continue reading "FDA Warns Not to Feed SimplyThick to Premature Infants" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 24, 2011 |
| Drug Humira Can Cause Permanent Damage to Optic Nerves |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Lawsuits have been filed throughout the country by people whose optic nerves were permanently damaged by Humira, generic name Adalimumab. While similar drugs have a specific warning about the risks of optic nerve damage, Humira does not.
Humira, manufactured by Abbott Laboratories, is one of the most lucrative drugs on the market, with 2010 worldwide sales of $6.5 billion. Humira was originally approved in 2003 as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. The FDA has since approved it for treatment of five additional autoimmune diseases: psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, moderate to severe chronic psoriasis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
In addition to permanent damage to the optic nerve, lawsuits have also been filed by people who allege their use of Humira caused cancer and peripheral nerve damage. |
|
| Continue reading "Drug Humira Can Cause Permanent Damage to Optic Nerves" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 24, 2011 |
| San Francisco Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
San Francisco Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of San Francisco physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
San Francisco Area Urologist:
Josh T. Hsu, MD
50 So San Mateo Dr Ste 120
San Francisco, CA 94401
(650) 348-7770
San Francisco Internal Medicine Specialists:
James E. Allison, MD
1001 Potrero Ave
San Francisco, CA 94110-3518
(415) 206-8709
William S. Andereck, MD
2100 Webster St Ste 418
San Francisco, CA 94115-2379
(415) 923-3025
Wade M. Aubry, MD
909 Hyde St Ste 125
San Francisco, CA 94109-4832
(415) 771-4366
Larry D. Bryson, MD
450 Sutter St Rm 1723
San Francisco, CA 94108-4101
(415) 362-7177
Richard L. Caplin, MD
2186 Geary Blvd Ste 314
San Francisco, CA 94115-3457
(415) 921-5300
Gary L. Chan, MD
909 Hyde St., Ste. 210
San Francisco, CA 94109-4845
(415) 474-7900
Ofer Eibschutz, MD
601 Van Ness Ave Ste 2008
San Francisco, CA 94102-6310
(415) 674-7000
John C. Fletcher, MD
3838 California St
San Francisco, CA 94118-1522
(415) 387-8805
Mark E. Higgins, MD
45 Castro St Ste 423
San Francisco, CA 94114
(415) 551-9758
Milton H. Louie, MD
450 Stanyan Street
San Francisco, CA 94117-1019
(415) 750-5561
Randall Low, MD
728 Pacific Ave Ste 501
San Francisco, CA 94133-4449
(415) 956-8339
Frank R. Malin, MD
909 Hyde St Ste 125
San Francisco, CA 94109-4832
(415) 771-4366
Kevin M. Man, MD
450 Sutter St Rm 1203
San Francisco, CA 94108-4001
(415) 362-3336
Robert J. Margolin, MD
2001 Union St, Ste 570
San Francisco, CA 94123-4127
(415) 694-7500
Robert E. Marshall, MD
3609 21st St
San Francisco, CA 94114-2912
(415) 695-0876
Philip J. O'Keefe, MD
45 Castro St Ste 138
San Francisco, CA 94114-1029
(415) 558-8200
Mark Oscherwitz, MD
1375 Sutter St, Suite 222
San Francisco, CA 94109
(415) 673-7600
William F. Owen Jr., MD
45 Castro St Ste 402
San Francisco, CA 94114-1027
(415) 861-2400
|
|
| Continue reading "San Francisco Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 23, 2011 |
| San Jose Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
San Jose Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of San Jose physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
San Jose Urologists:
Robert W. Andonian, MD
123 Di Salvo Ave Ste D
San Jose, CA 95128
(408) 279-0742
Mheir Doursounian, MD
4622 Hill Top View Ln
San Jose, CA 95138-2706
Shahram S. Gholami, MD
2581 Samaritan Dr Ste 200
San Jose, CA 95124
(408) 358-2030
Hossein Habibi, MD
175 N Jackson Ave Ste 206
San Jose, CA 95116
(408) 259-7282
Yu Hwong, MD
25 N 14th St Ste 900
San Jose, CA 95112
(408) 998-1877
Dale Y. Kunihira, MD
1884 Mc Daniel Ave
San Jose, CA 95126-1924
(408) 261-0316
David W. Noller, MD
5936 Kyburz Pl
San Jose, CA 95120-1711
(408) 268-9858
Robert P. Panvini, MD
2581 Samaritan Dr Ste 200
San Jose, CA 95124
(408) 358-2030
Timothy H. Tsang, MD
260 International Cir
San Jose, CA 95119
(408) 972-6095
Patrick E. Wherry, MD
2505 Samaritan Dr Ste 201
San Jose, CA 95124
(408) 356-7089
|
|
| Continue reading "San Jose Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 22, 2011 |
| San Diego Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
San Diego Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing
Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of San Diego physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
San Diego Urologists:
Mohamed Bidair, MD
5555 Reservoir Dr., Suite 203
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 229-2626
Stephen S. Bridge, MD
4060 Fourth Ave., Suite 310
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 297-4707
Vincent J. Flynn, MD
4647 Zion Ave.
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 528-5000
Jeffrey S. Gaines, MD
4405 Vandever Ave.
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 516-6366
Irwin Goldstein, MD
6719 Alvarado Rd., Suite 108
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 265-8865
Nicholas M. Holmes, MD
7930 Frost St., Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 279-8527
Christopher J. Kane, MD
200 W. Arbor Dr., MC 8897
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 543-2626
George W. Kaplan, MD
7930 Frost St., Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 279-8527
Danny L. Keiller, MD
4033 Third Ave., Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 299-0670
Ronald C. MacIntyre, MD
2929 Health Center Dr.
San Diego, CA 92123
(619) 234-6261
William G. Moseley, MD
3969 Fourth Ave., Suite 202
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 260-0060
Peter B. Nanigian, MD
4405 Vandever Ave., Dept. Urology
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 516-6336
Kenneth Nitahara, MD
4647 Zion Ave.
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 528-5000
Eugene Y. Rhee, MD
4650 Palm Ave., 3rd Floor
San Diego, CA 92154
(619) 662-5468
James L. Roberts, MD
4033 Third Ave., Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 299-0670
Marianne G. Rochester, MD
3969 Fourth Ave., Suite 202
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 260-0060
Carol E. Salem, MD
4060 Fourth Ave., Suite 310
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 297-4707
Joseph D. Schmidt, MD
200 W. Arbor Dr., MC 8897
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 543-5904
Roger L. Sur, MD
200 W. Arbor Dr., MC 8654
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 543-3572
George P. Szollar, MD
4647 Zion Ave.
San Diego, CA 92120
(619) 528-2575
Evan M. Vapnek, MD
4033 Third Ave., Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92103
(619) 299-0670
|
|
| Continue reading "San Diego Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 21, 2011 |
| Los Angeles Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Men who used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) and other sexual dysfunction have filed lawsuits arguing that Propecia's warnings are inadequate. Our law firm is investigating
Propecia side effects cases throughout California.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Propecia LawsuitsIf you used Propecia, then developed permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), loss of libido, or impotence, you may have a legal claim against Propecia's manufacturer, Merck & Co., Inc. A Propecia lawsuit is the only way to hold Merck accountable for the injuries caused by its product.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
If you or a loved one is experiencing Propecia side effects, contact us today for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation. You may use the contact form on the left, or call us toll free at 1-800-401-4720.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
The strength of your claim will depend on the medical records documenting your Propecia side effects. If you believe Propecia has caused permanent ED, loss of libido, or impotence, consult with a physician. We have provided a directory for your assistance of Los Angeles physicians who may be able to diagnose your Propecia side effects:
Los Angeles Urologists:
Thomas P. Bogaard, MD
1245 Wilshire Blvd Ste 306
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 483-7707
David A. Ginsberg, MD
1441 Eastlake Ave Ste 7416
Los Angeles, CA 90089
(310) 478-3334
Grady E. Harp, MD
1711 W Temple St
Los Angeles, CA 90026-5446
(626) 791-8123
Samuel K. Lee, MD
201 S Alvarado St Ste 622
Los Angeles, CA 90057
(213) 413-2622
Medhat N. Mansour, MD
2105 Beverly Blvd Ste 207
Los Angeles, CA 90057-2216
(213) 483-1007
Miguel A. Martinez, MD
1701 Cesar Chavez Ave Ste 500
Los Angeles, CA 90033-2464
(323) 261-0108
Rafael G. Mendez, MD
1245 Wilshire Blvd Ste 306
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(213) 483-6830
Charles E. Shapiro, MD
4900 Sunset Blvd 2nd Flr
Los Angeles, CA 90027-5814
(323) 667-5500
John J. Summers, MD
1300 N Vermont Ave Ste 1009
Los Angeles, CA 90027-6005
(323) 666-6210
Barton Tanenbaum, MD
201 South Alvarado Ste 215
Los Angeles, CA 90057
(213) 484-9900
|
|
| Continue reading "Los Angeles Propecia Lawyer California Attorneys" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 21, 2011 |
| Ohio Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For an Ohio Propecia Lawsuit, Ohio law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Ohio law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in OhioAn Ohio
Propecia lawsuit is subject to a two-year statute of limitations. Also, the discovery rule applies because the claim is for an injury caused by a drug. The running of the two-year statute of limitations is triggered when the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority, or when he should have known, that the injury s related to the drug, in this case Propecia.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
PLEASE NOTE: Exactly when the statute of limitations is triggered for a man's Propecia claim under Ohio law will depend on the specific facts his case, including the medical records documenting his injuries.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Relevant Ohio Statutes, Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10(A) & (B):
2305.10 Bodily injury or injury to personal property.
(A) Except as provided in division (C) or (E) of this section, an action based on a product liability claim and an action for bodily injury or injuring personal property shall be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues. Except as provided in divisions (B)(1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) of this section, a cause of action accrues under this division when the injury or loss to person or property occurs.
(B)(1) For purposes of division (A) of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury that is not described in division (B)(2), (3), (4), or (5) of this section and that is caused by exposure to hazardous or toxic chemicals, ethical drugs, or ethical medical devices accrues upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the plaintiff should have known that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, whichever date occurs first.
(2) For purposes of division (A) of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury caused by exposure to chromium in any of its chemical forms accrues upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the plaintiff should have known that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, whichever date occurs first.
(3) For purposes of division (A) of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury incurred by a veteran through exposure to chemical defoliants or herbicides or other causative agents, including agent orange, accrues upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the plaintiff should have known that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, whichever date occurs first.
(4) For purposes of division (A) of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury caused by exposure to diethylstilbestrol or other nonsteroidal synthetic estrogens, including exposure before birth, accrues upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the plaintiff should have known that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, whichever date occurs first.
(5) For purposes of division (A) of this section, a cause of action for bodily injury caused by exposure to asbestos accrues upon the date on which the plaintiff is informed by competent medical authority that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, or upon the date on which by the exercise of reasonable diligence the plaintiff should have known that the plaintiff has an injury that is related to the exposure, whichever date occurs first.
* * *
|
|
| Continue reading "Ohio Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 20, 2011 |
| Pennsylvania Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a Pennsylvania Propecia Lawsuit, Pennsylvania law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Pennsylvania law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in PennsylvaniaA Pennsylvania
Propecia claim is brought as a product liability lawsuit. Pennsylvania product liability lawsuits commonly include causes of action for strict liability, negligence and breach of warranty. As a claim for personal injury, a Pennsylvania Propecia claim must be brought within two years of the injury. However, Pennsylvania also recognizes the discovery rule.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
PLEASE NOTE: Exactly when the statute of limitations for a Propecia claim begins running under Pennsylvania law varies depending on the specific facts of each man's case, including the medical records documenting his injuries.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the
Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Relevant Pennsylvania Statute, 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 5524:
§ 5524. Two year limitation.
The following actions and proceedings must be commenced within two years:
(1) An action for assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution or malicious abuse of process.
(2) An action to recover damages for injuries to the person or for the death of an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect or unlawful violence or negligence of another.
(3) An action for taking, detaining or injuring personal property, including actions for specific recovery thereof.
(4) An action for waste or trespass of real property.
(5) An action upon a statute for a civil penalty or forfeiture.
(6) An action against any officer of any government unit for the nonpayment of money or the nondelivery of property collected upon on execution or otherwise in his possession.
(7) Any other action or proceeding to recover damages for injury to person or property which is founded on negligent, intentional, or otherwise tortious conduct or any other action or proceeding sounding in trespass, including deceit or fraud, except an action or proceeding subject to another limitation specified in this subchapter.
(8) (Deleted by amendment).
|
|
| Continue reading "Pennsylvania Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 20, 2011 |
| Illinois Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a Illinois Propecia Lawsuit, Illinois law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Illinois law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in IllinoisAn Illinois Propecia lawsuit is a product liability claim. Illinois product liability lawsuits usually include causes of action for strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Generally, a cause of action for personal injuries must be brought within two years of its accrual. The limitations period starts to run when the plaintiff knows, or reasonably should know, (1) that he has suffered an injury, and (2) that the injury was wrongfully caused.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
PLEASE NOTE: exactly when a cause of action accrues under Illinois law, and therefore also the deadline for bringing a claim for having developed Propecia side effects, varies based on the specific facts of each man's case, including the medical records documenting his injuries.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Relevant Illinois Statute, 735 ILCS 5/13‑202:
Sec. 13‑202. Personal injury ‑ Penalty. Actions for damages for an injury to the person, or for false imprisonment, or malicious prosecution, or for a statutory penalty, or for abduction, or for seduction, or for criminal conversation, except damages resulting from first degree murder or the commission of a Class X felony and the perpetrator thereof is convicted of such crime, shall be commenced within 2 years next after the cause of action accrued but such an action against a defendant arising from a crime committed by the defendant in whose name an escrow account was established under the "Criminal Victims' Escrow Account Act" shall be commenced within 2 years after the establishment of such account. If the compelling of a confession or information by imminent bodily harm or threat of imminent bodily harm results in whole or in part in a criminal prosecution of the plaintiff, the 2‑year period set out in this Section shall be tolled during the time in which the plaintiff is incarcerated, or until criminal prosecution has been finally adjudicated in favor of the above referred plaintiff, whichever is later. However, this provision relating to the compelling of a confession or information shall not apply to units of local government subject to the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act. |
|
| Continue reading "Illinois Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 19, 2011 |
| Utah Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a Utah Propecia Lawsuit, Utah law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Utah law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in UtahA Utah Propecia lawsuit is a product liability action because
Propecia is viewed as a defective product, because its manufacturer provided an inadequate warning of Propecia's side effects. Utah product liability lawsuits may include claims based on strict liability, negligence, and breach of express or implied warranties. The length of the statute of limitations depends on the type of claim, and because of this, a man who believes he may have suffered a Propecia side effect should not delay seeking legal advice.
Claims for negligence resulting in personal injury must be brought within four years of the injury. The discovery rule may toll the limitations period if the plaintiff makes an initial showing that he did not know and could not reasonably have known of the facts giving rise to the cause of action in time to file a timely claim, and either (a) the defendant concealed the facts or misled the plaintiff, or (b) exceptional circumstances exist that would make barring the claim irrational or unjust, where the hardship to the plaintiff, by applying the statute of limitations, outweighs the prejudice to the defendant from the passage of time. However, the discovery rule does not apply to a plaintiff who becomes aware of his injuries and a possible cause of action before the limitations period expires.
All claims under the Utah Product Liability Act, including those for personal injury, must be brought within two years of the time the claimant discovered or should have discovered both the harm and the cause. The running of the statute of limitations is tolled until the plaintiff discovers, or in the exercise of due diligence should have discovered: (1) that he was injured; (2) that the product has a causal relationship to the plaintiff's injury, and (3) the identity of the manufacturer.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
PLEASE NOTE: exactly when a cause of action accrues under Utah law, and therefore also the deadline for bringing a claim for having developed Propecia side effects, varies based on the specific facts of each man's case, including the nature of his injuries and their documentation in his medical records.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Selected Utah Statutes:
Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-307. Within four years.
An action may be brought within four years:
(1) after the last charge is made or the last payment is received:
(a) upon a contract, obligation, or liability not founded upon an instrument in writing;
(b) on an open store account for any goods, wares, or merchandise; or
(c) on an open account for work, labor or services rendered, or materials furnished;
(2) for a claim for relief or a cause of action under the following sections of Title 25, Chapter 6, Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act:
(a) Subsection 25-6-5(1)(a), which in specific situations limits the time for action to one year, under Section 25-6-10;
(b) Subsection 25-6-5(1)(b); or
(c) Subsection 25-6-6(1); and
(3) for relief not otherwise provided for by law.
Utah Code Ann. § 78B-6-706. Statute of limitations.
A civil action under this part shall be brought within two years from the time the individual who would be the claimant in the action discovered, or in the exercise of due diligence should have discovered, both the harm and its cause. |
|
| Continue reading "Utah Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 19, 2011 |
| Avandia No Longer To Be Sold in Retail Pharmacies |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on May 18, 2011, new and strict restrictions on the prescribing and use of Avandia and other rosiglitazone-containing medicines. After November 18, 2011, the drugs will no longer be available in retail pharmacies. Instead, both healthcare providers and patients must enroll in a special program in order to prescribe and receive these drugs.
Rosiglitazone-containing medicines include Avandia, Avandamet, and Avandaryl, and are used to treat type II diabetes. The FDA is imposing these restrictions because of data suggesting an elevated risk of heart attacks among users of Avandia and its generic forms. The restrictions are an implementation of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), an FDA program to manage serious risks of marketed drugs.
The complete FDA Drug Safety Communication on the new restrictions, and additional information from the FDA, may be found HERE.
|
|
| Continue reading "Avandia No Longer To Be Sold in Retail Pharmacies" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 19, 2011 |
| Oregon Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For an Oregon Propecia Lawsuit, Oregon law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Oregon law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in OregonAn Oregon Propecia lawsuit is a product liability action because it is based on the Propecia manufacturer failing to adequately warn of the erectile dysfunction, or warn that ED and other sexual dysfunction side effects can be permanent. An Oregon product liability action must be filed no later than two years from the date the injury or damage is first discovered or should have been discovered, whichever comes first.
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
PLEASE NOTE: exactly when a cause of action accrues under Oregon law, and therefore also the deadline for bringing a claim for having developed Propecia side effects, varies based on the facts of each man's case, including the specific nature of his injuries.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other Propecia side effects, contact the
Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Relevant Oregon Statute, Or. Rev. Stat. § 30.905:
30.905 Time limitation for commencement of action. (1) Subject to the limitation imposed by subsection (2) of this section, a product liability civil action for personal injury or property damage must be commenced not later than two years after the plaintiff discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the personal injury or property damage and the causal relationship between the injury or damage and the product, or the causal relationship between the injury or damage and the conduct of the defendant.
(2) A product liability civil action for personal injury or property damage must be commenced before the later of:
(a) Ten years after the date on which the product was first purchased for use or consumption; or
(b) The expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state in which the product was manufactured, or, if the product was manufactured in a foreign country, the expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state into which the product was imported.
(3) Subject to the limitation imposed by subsection (4) of this section, a product liability civil action for death must be commenced not later than three years after the decedent, the personal representative for the decedent or a person for whose benefit an action could be brought under ORS 30.020 discovers, or reasonably should have discovered, the causal relationship between the death and the product, or the causal relationship between the death and the conduct of the defendant.
(4) A product liability civil action for death must be commenced before the earlier of:
(a) Three years after the death of the decedent;
(b) Ten years after the date on which the product was first purchased for use or consumption; or
(c) The expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state in which the product was manufactured, or, if the product was manufactured in a foreign country, the expiration of any statute of repose for an equivalent civil action in the state into which the product was imported.
(5) This section does not apply to a civil action brought against a manufacturer, distributor, seller or lessor of a manufactured dwelling, as defined in ORS 446.003, or of a prefabricated structure, as defined in ORS 455.010. Actions described in this subsection are subject to the statute of limitations provided by ORS 12.135. |
|
| Continue reading "Oregon Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 18, 2011 |
| South Carolina Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a South Carolina Propecia Lawsuit, South Carolina law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because South Carolina law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in South CarolinaA Propecia lawsuit is a personal injury claim. Under South Carolina law, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims is three years. South Carolina also recognizes the "discovery rule."
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the
Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Selected South Carolina Statutes:
South Carolina Code of Laws
Title 15 - Civil Remedies and Procedures
CHAPTER 3. LIMITATION OF CIVIL ACTIONS
ARTICLE 5. ACTIONS OTHER THAN FOR RECOVERY OF REAL PROPERTY
SECTION 15-3-510. General rule.
The periods for the commencement of actions other than for the recovery of real property shall be as prescribed in the following sections.
SECTION 15-3-530. Three years.
Within three years:
(1) an action upon a contract, obligation, or liability, express or implied, excepting those provided for in Section 15-3-520;
(2) an action upon a liability created by statute other than a penalty or forfeiture;
(3) an action for trespass upon or damage to real property;
(4) an action for taking, detaining, or injuring any goods or chattels including an action for the specific recovery of personal property;
(5) an action for assault, battery, or any injury to the person or rights of another, not arising on contract and not enumerated by law, and those provided for in Section 15-3-545;
(6) an action under Sections 15-51-10 to 15-51-60 for death by wrongful act, the period to begin to run upon the death of the person on account of whose death the action is brought;
(7) any action for relief on the ground of fraud in cases which prior to the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1870 were solely cognizable by the court of chancery, the cause of action in the case not considered to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud;
(8) an action on any policy of insurance, either fire or life, whereby any person or property, resident or situate in this State, may be or may have been insured, or for or on account of any loss arising under the policy, any clause, condition, or limitation contained in the policy to the contrary notwithstanding; and
(9) an action against directors or stockholders of a monied corporation or a banking association to recover a penalty or forfeiture imposed or to enforce a liability created by law, the cause of action in the case not considered to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts upon which the penalty or forfeiture attached or the liability was created, unless otherwise provided in the law under which the corporation is organized.
SECTION 15-3-535. Limitation on actions commenced under Section 15-3-530(5).
Except as to actions initiated under Section 15-3-545, all actions initiated under Section 15-3-530(5) must be commenced within three years after the person knew or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known that he had a cause of action.
|
|
| Continue reading "South Carolina Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 17, 2011 |
| Minnesota Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a Minnesota Propecia Lawsuit, Minnesota law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Minnesota law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in MinnesotaA Minnesota Propecia lawsuit is brought against Propecia's manufacturer. It is a product liability claim because, having failed to come with an adequate warning of the risks of permanent ED and other sexual dysfunction side effects,
Propecia is a defective product. Minnesota product liability lawsuits can be brought under the following legal theories: strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty.
Minnesota residents are particularly fortunate because several of the Minnesota statutes of limitations that apply to product liability claims are significantly longer than those of other states. However, Minnesota law does not delay commencement of the running of the limitations period when the person is unaware of their claim.
Under Minnesota law, the statute of limitations for a negligence claim resulting in personal injury is six years from when the cause of action accrues. A strict liability claim and a breach-of-warranty claim both have a four-year statute of limitations in Minnesota. A wrongful death claim has a three-year statute of limitations.
The statute of limitations in Minnesota begins to run when a person sustains just "some" damages. This means that the deadline for filing a lawsuit can begin running even if a person is not aware of their damages or even that they have a claim. Thus, Minnesota residents should never delay seeking legal counsel if they believe they have been injured.
PLEASE NOTE: When the applicable Minnesota statutes of limitations begin to run for an individual man's right to bring a claim for Propecia side effects varies depending on the unique facts of that man's case.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
The DeCarli Law Propecia lawyers will provide telephone consultations and investigate MRI side effect claims for residents of all Minnesota cities and towns, including Minneapolis, St. Paul, Rochester, Duluth, Bloomington, Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, St. Cloud, Eagan, Coon Rapids, Maple Grove, Eden Prairie, Burnsville, Woodbury, Blaine,
Lakeville, Minnetonka, and Apple Valley.
|
|
| Continue reading "Minnesota Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 16, 2011 |
| Massachusetts Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a Massachusetts Propecia Lawsuit, Massachusetts law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Massachusetts law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in MassachusettsA Massachusetts lawsuit for Propecia side effects is brought against Propecia's manufacturer. This is a product liability claim because, having caused a side effect for which there was no adequate warning, Propecia is a defective product. The causes of action most frequently asserted in Massachusetts product liability lawsuits are negligence, breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices that violate Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts General Laws.
Under Massachusetts law, the statute of limitations for a negligence action and "tort-based" warranty actions is three years from the date the cause of action "accrues." A cause of action "accrues" on the occurrence of some appreciable injury. However, when an injury is latent or "inherently unknowable," the discovery rule applies and the action does not accrue until a person knows or reasonably should have known that he or she has been injured. For Chapter 93A unfair or deceptive acts or practices claims, the statute of limitations is four years.
PLEASE NOTE: When the Massachusetts statutes of limitations begin to run for an individual man's right to bring a claim for Propecia side effects varies depending on the unique facts of that man's case.
Propecia AttorneysIf you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Selected Massachusetts Statutes:
CHAPTER 260. LIMITATIONS OF ACTION
Section 2A. Tort, contract to recover for personal injuries, and replevin actions.
Except as otherwise provided, actions of tort, actions of contract to recover for personal injuries, and actions of replevin, shall be commenced only within three years next after the cause of action accrues.
Section 4. Certain tort or contract actions for malpractice, error or mistake
Actions of contract or tort for malpractice, error or mistake against attorneys, certified public accountants and public accountants, actions for assault and battery, false imprisonment, slander, libel, actions against sheriffs, deputy sheriffs, constables or assignees in insolvency for the taking or conversion of personal property, actions of tort for injuries to the person against counties, cities and towns, and actions of contract or tort for malpractice, error or mistake against hairdressers, operators and shops registered under sections eighty-seven T to eighty-seven JJ, inclusive of chapter one hundred and twelve, actions of tort for bodily injuries or for death the payment of judgments in which is required to be secured by chapter ninety and also actions of tort for bodily injuries or for death or for damage to property against officers and employees of the commonwealth, and of any county, city or town, arising out of the operation of motor or other vehicles owned by the commonwealth, including those under the control of said commission, or by any such county, city or town, suits by judgment creditors in such actions of tort under section one hundred and thirteen of chapter one hundred and seventy-five and clause (9) of section three of chapter two hundred and fourteen and suits on motor vehicle liability bonds under section thirty-four G of said chapter ninety shall be commenced only within three years next after the cause of action accrues.
Actions of contract or tort for malpractice, error or mistake against physicians, surgeons, dentists, optometrists, hospitals and sanitoria shall be commenced only within three years after the cause of action accrues, but in no event shall any such action be commenced more than seven years after occurrence of the act or omission which is the alleged cause of the injury upon which such action is based except where the action is based upon the leaving of a foreign object in the body.
For the purposes only of this section, an officer or soldier of the military forces of the commonwealth, as defined in chapter thirty-three, shall while performing any lawfully ordered military duty be deemed to be an officer or employee of the commonwealth.
|
|
| Continue reading "Massachusetts Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 15, 2011 |
| Wisconsin Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a Wisconsin Propecia Lawsuit, Wisconsin law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Wisconsin law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in WisconsinA Wisconsin propecia side effect lawsuit is brought against Propecia's manufacturer. It is filed as a product liability claim because Propecia is considered a defective product. In Wisconsin, strict liability and negligence are two alternative theories of recovery for product liability claims.
Under Wisconsin law, causes of action for personal injury must be brought within three years after the cause of action accrues. By way of comparison, many other states only have a two-year limitation period. Wisconsin uses the "discovery rule" to determine when a cause of action accrues. Under the discovery rule, a claim accrues on the date the injury is discovered, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered, which means that is the date the two-year period begins to run.
PLEASE NOTE: When the statute of limitations begins to run for an individual man's right to bring a claim for Propecia side effects varies depending on the unique facts of that man's case.
Propecia AttorneysIf you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Relevant Wisconsin Statute:
Wis. Stat. § 893.54.
893.54 Injury to the person. The following actions shall be commenced within 3 years or be barred:
(1) An action to recover damages for injuries to the person.
|
|
| Continue reading "Wisconsin Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 14, 2011 |
| Arizona Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For an Arizona Propecia Lawsuit, Arizona law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Arizona law creates a deadline for filing a Propecia claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in ArizonaAn Arizona Propecia lawsuit is a product liability claim. In Arizona, a product liability action can be brought using negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty theories.
The Arizona statute of limitations governing product liability claims is relatively short. This means a Propecia claim in Arizona must be brought within two years after the cause of action "accrues." A cause of action in Arizona "accrues" on the date a person discovers their injury, or on the date that they would have discovered their injury if they had exercised "reasonable diligence."
Please note: exactly when a cause of action accrues under Arizona law, and therefore also the deadline for bringing a claim for having developed Propecia side effects, varies based on the specific facts of each person's case.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Selected Arizona Statutes:
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 12-542. Injury to person; injury when death ensues; injury to property; conversion of property; forcible entry and forcible detainer; two year limitation.
Except as provided in section 12-551 there shall be commenced and prosecuted within two years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward, the following actions:
1. For injuries done to the person of another including causes of action for medical malpractice as defined in section 12-561.
2. For injuries done to the person of another when death ensues from such injuries, which action shall be considered as accruing at the death of the party injured.
3. For trespass for injury done to the estate or the property of another.
4. For taking or carrying away the goods and chattels of another.
5. For detaining the personal property of another and for converting such property to one's own use.
6. For forcible entry or forcible detainer, which action shall be considered as accruing at the commencement of the forcible entry or detainer.
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 12-551. Product liability.
A product liability action as defined in section 12-681 shall be commenced and prosecuted within the period prescribed in section 12-542, except that no product liability action may be commenced and prosecuted if the cause of action accrues more than twelve years after the product was first sold for use or consumption, unless the cause of action is based upon the negligence of the manufacturer or seller or a breach of an express warranty provided by the manufacturer or seller. |
|
| Continue reading "Arizona Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 13, 2011 |
| Arkansas Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For an Arkansas Propecia Lawsuit, Arkansas law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because Arkansas law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in ArkansasAn Arkansas Propecia lawsuit is a product liability action. Under Arkansas law, a product liability action includes all actions brought for or on account of personal injury, death, or property damaged caused by, or resulting from, the manufacture, construction, design, formula, preparation, assembly, testing, service, warning, instruction, marketing, packaging, or labeling of any product.
Under Arkansas law, the statute of limitations for negligence and strict liability actions is three years, which means that a lawsuit must be filed within three years after any injury or death caused by a defective product. By way of comparison, in most other states, the statute of limitations is only two years. Arkansas also applies the "discovery rule" to product liability claims, which means the statute of limitations does not begin to run until a person knows or by exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered the causal connection between erectile dysfunction (ED) and other side effects, and their taking Propecia.
PLEASE NOTE: When the statute of limitations begins to run for an individual person's right to bring a claim for Propecia side effects varies depending on the specific facts of each person's case. For this reason, if you believe you might have NSF, please contact DeCarli Law immediately.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
|
|
| Continue reading "Arkansas Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 13, 2011 |
| California Propecia Lawsuit |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
For a California Propecia Lawsuit, California law establishes a limited amount of time for when a claim can be filed. This period of time is called a "statute of limitations." Because California law creates a deadline for filing a claim, a man who believes he may be suffering from
Propecia side effects such as permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, or loss of libido, should consult with an attorney as soon as possible.
Learn More About Propecia and its Risks
HERE
Learn More About Propecia Side Effects
HERE
Learn More About Propecia Lawsuits
HERE
Statute of Limitations for Propecia Lawsuits in CaliforniaA California Propecia lawsuit is a product liability claim. In California, product liability lawsuits commonly include causes of action for strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty.
The California statute of limitations governing product liability claims is relatively short: two years. This means a Propecia claim in California must be brought within two years after the cause of action "accrues." However, California also recognizes the "discovery rule." That means that a cause of action accrues when a plaintiff has knowledge of the injury, and knowledge of facts creating, or which in any reasonable person would create, a suspicion of wrongdoing on the part of someone, even if the plaintiff is unable to identify the wrongdoer.
Please note: exactly when a cause of action accrues under California law, and therefore also the deadline for bringing a claim for having developed Propecia side effects, varies based on the specific facts of each person's case.
If you or a loved one suffers from permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) or other
Propecia side effects, contact the Propecia lawyers at DeCarli Law for a free, no-obligation telephone consultation. Our main office is in San Francisco but we assist clients throughout California and the United States. You may reach us by telephone, or by using the "Contact Us" form on the left side of the page. All inquiries will be completely confidential.
Selected California Statutes:
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335
The periods prescribed for the commencement of actions other than for the recovery of real property, are as follows:
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1
Within two years: An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another.
|
|
| Continue reading "California Propecia Lawsuit" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 10, 2011 |
| Propecia Class Action Information |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Although there is a Propecia class action in Canada, there is no such litigation in the United States, and that's a good thing. In the United States, a man who has suffered a
Propecia side effect files his own lawsuit because the injury is severe enough to justify his own, individual claim.
To learn more about why the class action mechanism is inappropriate for a serious bodily injury like a Propecia side effect, read
HERE. Also, to learn more about the potentially dangerous side effects from Propecia, read
HERE.
|
|
| Continue reading "Propecia Class Action Information" » |
|
| Permalink |
| |
| May 08, 2011 |
| The Various Finasteride Brand Names: They All Have Erectile Dysfunction Side Effects |
| Posted By DeCarli Law |
|
Finasteride is sold under various names, in addition to the brand names
Propecia and
Proscar. It is important no know these drug names because
Finasteride’s side effects include permanent erectile dysfunction (ED), along with other permanent forms of sexual dysfunction.
Brands of generic Proscar include Finast, Fincar, and Prosteride. Brands of generic
Propecia include Finax and Finpecia. Although
Propecia and
Proscar and their generic forms are all Finasteride and therefore chemically indistinguishable, the doses are different.
Proscar, and its generic forms Finast, Fincar and Prosteride, are for treating enlarged prostate, and the pills are 5 mg. strength.
Propecia, and its generic forms Finax and Finpecia, are for treatment of male pattern hair loss, and their strength is only 1 mg. However, even though
Proscar and its generic forms are approved only for prostate treatment, they also are commonly prescribed for hair loss in order to be covered by health insurance.
If you have developed permanent sexual dysfunction as a result of taking Finasteride in any of its various forms, you may have a legal claim against the drug manufacturer for your injuries. You can learn more HERE.
|
|
| Continue reading "The Various Finasteride Brand Names: They All Have Erectile Dysfunction Side Effects" » |
|
| Permalink |
| | |